Rethink College Park

Helping imagine a great college town for a great university
  • Home
  • About
  • Library
  • Development Map/Projects by Numbers
  • Contribute
  • Categories
    • Businesses
    • Community Events
    • East Campus
    • Economic Development Update
    • Environment
    • Events
    • General College Park
      • College Park Airport
      • Downtown
      • Hollywood
      • Knox Box Redevelopment
      • Northgate Area
      • Old Town
        • Historic District
      • Route 1
    • Greenbelt
    • Housing
    • Hyattsville
    • On Campus Development
    • Other College Towns
    • Politics
    • Projects
      • 2007 Solar House
      • Book Exchange Site
      • Byrd Stadium
      • Cafritz Property
      • Camden College Park
      • City Garage/Condos/City Hall
      • College Perk Redevelopment
      • Commerce Bank
      • Commons 7 and 8
      • Domain at College Park
      • Enclave at 8700 – Formerly Starview Plaza
      • EYA Arts District Hyattsville
      • Golub Property
      • Greenbelt Station
      • Hilton Hotel
      • Hollywood Station
      • Ikea
      • Jefferson Square
      • Knight Hall Journalism Building
      • M Square Research Park
      • Mazza Grandmarc
      • Mosaic at Turtle Creek
      • NOAA Building
      • Northgate Condominiums
      • Northgate Park
      • Oakland Hall
      • PDC Campfire Condominiums
      • Physical Sciences Complex
      • Poole Property
      • Raymond Towers
      • The Jefferson
      • The Varsity
      • University View
      • University View Overlook
      • Van Munching Hall Expansion
    • Site Announcements
    • Speculation
    • Transportation
      • Bicycles
      • Connector Road
      • Purple Line
    • Uncategorized
    • Wallace Loh
    • Weekly Round-Up
  • Development Projects
    • No categories
  • Subscribe via RSS

Historic District Considered Near Downtown

October 5th, 2006  |  by Rob Goodspeed  |  Published in Downtown, Historic District, Old Town  |  4 Comments

College Park StreetcarA proposed Old Town College Park Historic District could prevent or slow new, pedestrian-scale development connecting the campus and downtown to the Metro station. The proposed district includes structures on both sides of Calvert Road, a street several groups from last spring’s design charrette targeted for dense development to create a pedestrian corridor running from the Metro station to downtown, the Knox Road area, and the campus.

If approved, the historic district would require all property owners within the district boundary — whether or not their property was identified as “historic” — to obtain a special “Historic Area Work Permit” from the County before engaging in any type of Historic Houseconstruction. Owners of “historic” properties would be eligible for tax credits/incentives on approved restoration and construction projects. When the City Council approved the nomination at their May 9, 2006 meeting several citizens spoke against the proposal, calling the additional permits that would be required a “hardship,” “headache” and “hassle,” and complaining it could be difficult to find contractors familiar with historic district restrictions. Several speakers cited a poll that found a majority of homes in the proposed district area did not want the district, although the minutes record the Old Town Civic Association submitted a letter in support of the district.

According to information provided to us by city planner Elisa Vitale, the historic district was conceived in 2000 by city officials and approved in 2004 by the county. However, she describes what happened after an appeal:

The HPC decision was appealed and the case was forwarded to the Zoning Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner heard the case, and issued her decision in November of 2005. This decision upheld the designation of the area as a historic district as appropriate, but recommended that the case be remanded to the HPC due to failure of HPC staff to follow notice requirements. On March 13, 2006, the District Council heard oral arguments on the ZHE’s recommendation. On March 27, 2006, the District Council issued an order of remand and returned the case to the HPC. The HPC held a second a public hearing on the proposed district on June 1, 2006, and again voted in favor of designating the district. The HPC also adopted the revised
Design Guidelines.

However, the June 1 decision has been appealed and will return to the Zoning Hearing Examiner. They have not yet set a hearing date, although we will post here when we hear when the date is set. We imagine this issue has proven so controversial because it involves not only historic preservation but also the property values of property owners, and whether or not the number of renters will increase in the neighborhood.

To read more about the restrictions of a Historic District, see the proposed design guidelines for Old Town, or view a map of the proposed district visit the new Old Town Historic District page in our library.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Responses

Feed Trackback Address
  1. Rob Goodspeed says:

    October 5th, 2006 at 7:32 pm (#)

    A city planner has asked we note “The HPC is lenient in its judgment of HAWP applications for structures of little historical or design significance.”

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Shawn Magnuson says:

    October 5th, 2006 at 11:12 pm (#)

    Is it possible that the historical district distinction could raise property values?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Eric Fidler says:

    October 18th, 2006 at 2:58 am (#)

    My guess is that it will probably limit the rate of appreciation, since it will not increase the value of the neighborhood but will merely add more regulations and limitations on what property owners can do. However, a less likely alternative is that the historic preservation statutes enhance the “charm” of the town, resulting in a “Georgetownification” in which the neighborhood as a whole is prized because of the meticulous preservation of each of its constituent parts. Still, I think this is less likely than the former scenario because the town’s “charm” is definitely arguable (hence the scare-quotes).

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Shawn Magnuson says:

    October 29th, 2006 at 1:30 pm (#)

    Charming neighborhoods are what would make people want to live in College Park. Would you want this city to look like a cookie-cutter outer suburb?

    I think that it’s a good idea; a charming, desirable residential neighborhood will be a boon to much of the redevelopment this site hopes for.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Who’s Talking?

  • chris Allen on CSX Crossing Issues Threaten Cafritz Project
  • alex on Adios to the Santa Fe Cafe
  • sex atlas on College Park Business Beat – October
  • Eugene Sanford on 94th Aero Squadron is Closed (UPDATED)
  • College Park: Public Transit is Key! | LiveSmart DC on About

Pages

  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Finances
    • Staff
  • Contribute
  • Development Map/Projects by Numbers
  • Library
    • “Knox Box” Development District
    • 2006 Student Charrette
    • Campus Connector Road
    • Campus Master Plan
    • East Campus Redevelopment Initiative
    • M-Square
    • North Gate Development District
    • Old Town Historic District
    • Purple Line
    • Route 1 Corridor Sector Plan

Calendar

Know an event that should be posted? Contact us about it.

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
eXTReMe Tracker











Categories & Projects

Archives


Connect With Us on Facebook

Subscribe to Our Announcements

Email:
Browse Archives at groups.google.com

Follow Us on Twitter


©2013 Rethink College Park
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.