Rethink College Park

Helping imagine a great college town for a great university
  • Home
  • About
  • Library
  • Development Map/Projects by Numbers
  • Contribute
  • Categories
    • Businesses
    • East Campus
    • Economic Development Update
    • Environment
    • Events
    • General College Park
      • College Park Airport
      • Downtown
      • Hollywood
      • Knox Box Redevelopment
      • Northgate Area
      • Old Town
        • Historic District
      • Route 1
    • Greenbelt
    • Housing
    • Hyattsville
    • On Campus Development
    • Other College Towns
    • Politics
    • Projects
      • 2007 Solar House
      • Byrd Stadium
      • Cafritz Property
      • Camden College Park
      • City Garage/Condos/City Hall
      • College Perk Redevelopment
      • Commerce Bank
      • Commons 7 and 8
      • Domain at College Park
      • EYA Arts District Hyattsville
      • Golub Property
      • Greenbelt Station
      • Hilton Hotel
      • Hollywood Station
      • Ikea
      • Jefferson Square
      • Knight Hall Journalism Building
      • M Square Research Park
      • Mazza Grandmarc
      • Mosaic at Turtle Creek
      • NOAA Building
      • Northgate Condominiums
      • Northgate Park
      • Oakland Hall
      • PDC Campfire Condominiums
      • Physical Sciences Complex
      • Poole Property
      • Raymond Towers
      • Starview Plaza
      • The Jefferson
      • The Varsity
      • University View
      • University View Overlook
      • Van Munching Hall Expansion
    • Site Announcements
    • Speculation
    • Transportation
      • Bicycles
      • Connector Road
      • Purple Line
    • Uncategorized
  • Development Projects
    • No categories
  • Subscribe via RSS

No Plans Yet For East Campus Public Input

December 1st, 2006  |  by Rob Goodspeed  |  Published in East Campus, On Campus Development  |  1 Comment

East CampusAlthough university officials have discussed some opportunities for public input in the project, the university has announced no details about public involvement in the unprecedented East Campus Redevelopment Project. The project will redevelop roughly 38 acres of university land on Route 1 that will house hundreds of students, faculty, and staff and include millions of square feet of offices, shops, and potentially a hotel and conference center.

A select group of development companies has been invited to complete detailed proposals (“RFP Part B“) for university officials to use to select a final winner. University officials say the identity of the applicants and finalists is secret, saying disclosure would violate procurement rules and threaten the selection process. The selection of the group of finalists and the final winner of the contract will be made by an Evaluation Committee, with the assistance of hired consultants. The membership of the Evaluation Committee has been kept secret, presumably also to protect the selection process. As far as we know there are no students on this committee. Although two student representatives were added to a “Steering Committee” last summer, this body seems to have little decision-making authority and a smaller “subcommittee” has no students.

University officials have asked the finalists to prepare detailed land use and development plans including at “at a minimum” the following for their final proposals:

  • Locations, layouts, square footages, and other characteristics of retail, office, entertainment, hospitality and related uses. Neither a model, nor renderings is required, but proposed building heights, massing plans and densities should be clearly delineated throughout the site. Typical elevations would be helpful.
  • Locations, unit sizes, descriptions and price points of housing uses
  • Location, layout, function and programming for streets and other public spaces
  • Circulation including transit, automobile, bicycle and pedestrian circulation within the site and connecting to key points outside the site should be shown.
  • Pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular connections to Metrorail, M Square, Main Campus and the City of College Park.

We are concerned it may be difficult to include genuine public input in the project if the public is presented with polished plans. Planning professionals know the quality of input can depend on how the public is approached, and in general rough models and hand drawings elicit more and better quality feedback than polished computer graphics. In order for public input to be meaningful, university officials and the final development partner must also be clear about what aspects of the design are open to modification.

We are in dialogue with University administrators about their strategy to involve the public once a final partner is selected — currently tentatively scheduled for February 28th, 2007. If you have ideas on how to engage the public in east campus (or would like to help) we would love to hear from you. We are convinced that an aggressive and wide-ranging effort to involve the campus and College Park community in this project is not only the right thing to do, but will ultimately result in a better East Campus design.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Responses

Feed Trackback Address
  1. Laurence Aurbach says:

    December 12th, 2006 at 9:54 am (#)

    I share your concerns. If the plans for circulation, land use and building massing are detailed at this stage and used as a basis for selecting a developer, the plans will be set in stone to some degree. And you’re right, that is likely to make resident support more difficult to obtain.

    A better process could be to select adeveloper based on past work and the demonstrated approaches and practices of the firm. Then elaborate the circulation pattern, land use, building massing, as well as necessary code changes and specific design elements, in a public charrette. The charrette should be organized to maximize public participation and input.

    There’s nothing prohibiting a full scale public charrette after the current selection process is completed, but that will require specific direction AND support to come directly from the University and city and county officials.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Response

Who’s Talking?

  • TimW on Best Buy & The Original Ledo’s Opening Soon
  • Pat on Best Buy & The Original Ledo’s Opening Soon
  • Pat on Best Buy & The Original Ledo’s Opening Soon
  • Brooks on Best Buy & The Original Ledo’s Opening Soon
  • Donald on Best Buy & The Original Ledo’s Opening Soon

Pages

  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Finances
    • Staff
  • Contribute
  • Development Map/Projects by Numbers
  • Library
    • “Knox Box” Development District
    • 2006 Student Charrette
    • Campus Connector Road
    • Campus Master Plan
    • East Campus Redevelopment Initiative
    • M-Square
    • North Gate Development District
    • Old Town Historic District
    • Purple Line
    • Route 1 Corridor Sector Plan

Calendar

Know an event that should be posted? Contact us about it.

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
eXTReMe Tracker







Site Supporter

Thinking about making the move to Maryland? Stay in Baltimore hotels while you search for your dream home.

Categories & Projects

Archives


Connect With Us on Facebook

Subscribe to Our Announcements

Email:
Browse Archives at groups.google.com

Follow Us on Twitter


©2010 Rethink College Park
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.