Rethink College Park

Helping imagine a great college town for a great university
  • Home
  • About
  • Library
  • Development Map/Projects by Numbers
  • Contribute
  • Categories
    • Businesses
    • Community Events
    • East Campus
    • Economic Development Update
    • Environment
    • Events
    • General College Park
      • College Park Airport
      • Downtown
      • Hollywood
      • Knox Box Redevelopment
      • Northgate Area
      • Old Town
        • Historic District
      • Route 1
    • Greenbelt
    • Housing
    • Hyattsville
    • On Campus Development
    • Other College Towns
    • Politics
    • Projects
      • 2007 Solar House
      • Byrd Stadium
      • Cafritz Property
      • Camden College Park
      • City Garage/Condos/City Hall
      • College Perk Redevelopment
      • Commerce Bank
      • Commons 7 and 8
      • Domain at College Park
      • EYA Arts District Hyattsville
      • Golub Property
      • Greenbelt Station
      • Hilton Hotel
      • Hollywood Station
      • Ikea
      • Jefferson Square
      • Knight Hall Journalism Building
      • M Square Research Park
      • Mazza Grandmarc
      • Mosaic at Turtle Creek
      • NOAA Building
      • Northgate Condominiums
      • Northgate Park
      • Oakland Hall
      • PDC Campfire Condominiums
      • Physical Sciences Complex
      • Poole Property
      • Raymond Towers
      • Starview Plaza
      • The Jefferson
      • The Varsity
      • University View
      • University View Overlook
      • Van Munching Hall Expansion
    • Site Announcements
    • Speculation
    • Transportation
      • Bicycles
      • Connector Road
      • Purple Line
    • Uncategorized
  • Development Projects
    • No categories
  • Subscribe via RSS

New Dorms Unlikely Thanks to State Law

January 15th, 2007  |  by Rob Goodspeed  |  Published in Housing, On Campus Development  |  3 Comments

Centreville HallAlthough local leaders want them, state law means new dorms are unlikely to be the answer to the student housing problem at Maryland. In response to our question about alleviating the student housing crunch on our city council special election candidate survey, District 3 candidate Stephanie Stullich and District 4 candidates Mary Cook and Russell Scarato all mentioned new dormitories as part of their answers.

New dorms are thought of as unlikely because state law demands dorms be self-supporting. Official University policy on student housing explains in more detail:

Residence Halls, the Graduate Apartments, and dining halls must be self-supported by mandate of the General Assembly. No State or University funding is received, so student fees must be sufficient to pay all expenses including utilities, facilities renewal, plant maintenance and construction debts. In addition, the affected departments (Resident Life, Graduate Apartments, Dining Services) must pay a percentage of expenses to the University as overhead.

The effect of the law is that the University itself — or a private partner — must bear the debt burden to construct any new dorms. The last residence hall (suites) the university built by itself was New Leonardtown in 1982. The last traditional dormitory they built was La Plata Hall in 1968!

Since then the university has partnered with private developers to build the 1825 bed South Campus Commons and the 700 bed University Courtyards. In 2005, the Diamondback reported university officials were optimistic they would be able to finance a new dorm on North Campus that would house 500 students. However, since then the Board of Regents denied funding for construction.

The trend away from state supported housing has been hugely problematic – especially since a lot of the demand comes from freshman wanting traditional dormitories without kitchens (not conducive to a public-private partnership) thus pushing older students off-campus. In the mid-90’s, 50% of freshmen sought on-campus housing. Now it’s over 90%.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Responses

Feed Trackback Address
  1. Eric Fidler says:

    January 17th, 2007 at 3:54 am (#)

    It’s ironic that a state supposedly dedicated to Smart Growth ignores a perfect opportunity to sate such a tremendous demand for housing density on the Univ. of Maryland campus.

    And thus the sprawl goes on…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Hellmut says:

    January 17th, 2007 at 7:58 pm (#)

    The university is making million dollar profits by coordinating a commercial housing cartell on campus. These profits should be dedicated to affordable housing.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. David Daddio says:

    January 17th, 2007 at 8:02 pm (#)

    That is in fact incorrect.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Response

Who’s Talking?

  • calvert hills on Turning the Page – Critical Sept. 14th Local Primaries
  • David Daddio on Prince George’s County Council Election
  • Undergrad 2 on Mazza Grandmarc NOW OPEN
  • Grump on Best Buy & The Original Ledo’s Opening Soon
  • Chris Coraggio on UMD/CP Jump on the Bikesharing Bandwagon (again)

Pages

  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Finances
    • Staff
  • Contribute
  • Development Map/Projects by Numbers
  • Library
    • “Knox Box” Development District
    • 2006 Student Charrette
    • Campus Connector Road
    • Campus Master Plan
    • East Campus Redevelopment Initiative
    • M-Square
    • North Gate Development District
    • Old Town Historic District
    • Purple Line
    • Route 1 Corridor Sector Plan

Calendar

Know an event that should be posted? Contact us about it.

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
eXTReMe Tracker







Categories & Projects

Archives


Connect With Us on Facebook

Subscribe to Our Announcements

Email:
Browse Archives at groups.google.com

Follow Us on Twitter


©2010 Rethink College Park
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.